Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Values Enactment in Organizations: A Multi-Level Examination

Identifieur interne : 006164 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 006163; suivant : 006165

Values Enactment in Organizations: A Multi-Level Examination

Auteurs : Melissa L. Gruys [États-Unis] ; Susan M. Stewart [États-Unis] ; Jerry Goodstein [États-Unis] ; Mark N. Bing [États-Unis] ; Andrew C. Wicks [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:E75EBE587781D480F016CA3CEFB752D57216C14E

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Business writers and practitioners recommend that core organizational values be integrated into employee work life for enhanced organizational productivity, yet no published studies have empirically examined the antecedents and outcomes of values enactment. Using longitudinal data on 2,622 employees, hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) results revealed that tenure and department-level values enactment were significant predictors of individual values enactment. Furthermore, employees who demonstrated high levels of values enactment were less likely to leave, and employees of high or low levels of values enactment in departments whose levels of values enactment matched their own were the most likely to be promoted.

Url:
DOI: 10.1177/0149206308318610


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Values Enactment in Organizations: A Multi-Level Examination</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gruys, Melissa L" sort="Gruys, Melissa L" uniqKey="Gruys M" first="Melissa L." last="Gruys">Melissa L. Gruys</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stewart, Susan M" sort="Stewart, Susan M" uniqKey="Stewart S" first="Susan M." last="Stewart">Susan M. Stewart</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Goodstein, Jerry" sort="Goodstein, Jerry" uniqKey="Goodstein J" first="Jerry" last="Goodstein">Jerry Goodstein</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bing, Mark N" sort="Bing, Mark N" uniqKey="Bing M" first="Mark N." last="Bing">Mark N. Bing</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wicks, Andrew C" sort="Wicks, Andrew C" uniqKey="Wicks A" first="Andrew C." last="Wicks">Andrew C. Wicks</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E75EBE587781D480F016CA3CEFB752D57216C14E</idno>
<date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1177/0149206308318610</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E75EBE587781D480F016CA3CEFB752D57216C14E/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007289</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007289</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007289</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002434</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002434</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0149-2063:2008:Gruys M:values:enactment:in</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">006247</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">006164</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">006164</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Values Enactment in Organizations: A Multi-Level Examination</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gruys, Melissa L" sort="Gruys, Melissa L" uniqKey="Gruys M" first="Melissa L." last="Gruys">Melissa L. Gruys</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="syntax">???</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Management, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435-0001</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Ohio</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stewart, Susan M" sort="Stewart, Susan M" uniqKey="Stewart S" first="Susan M." last="Stewart">Susan M. Stewart</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Illinois</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>Department of Management, Western Illinois University-Quad Cities, Moline</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Goodstein, Jerry" sort="Goodstein, Jerry" uniqKey="Goodstein J" first="Jerry" last="Goodstein">Jerry Goodstein</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Washington (État)</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>Department of Management and Operations, Washington State University-Vancouver, Vancouver</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bing, Mark N" sort="Bing, Mark N" uniqKey="Bing M" first="Mark N." last="Bing">Mark N. Bing</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">État du Mississippi</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>Department of Management, University of Mississippi, University</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wicks, Andrew C" sort="Wicks, Andrew C" uniqKey="Wicks A" first="Andrew C." last="Wicks">Andrew C. Wicks</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Virginie</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>The Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of management</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0149-2063</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1557-1211</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>SAGE Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2008-08">2008-08</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="806">806</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="843">843</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0149-2063</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0149-2063</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Absolute level</term>
<term>Administrative science</term>
<term>Antecedent</term>
<term>Aspen institute</term>
<term>Associate professor</term>
<term>Bandura</term>
<term>Bliese</term>
<term>Borman motowidlo</term>
<term>Business ethics</term>
<term>Certain ways</term>
<term>Chatman</term>
<term>Cohen cohen</term>
<term>Collins porras</term>
<term>Common goal</term>
<term>Contextual</term>
<term>Contextual performance</term>
<term>Control variables</term>
<term>Core values</term>
<term>Corporate values</term>
<term>Corresponding decrease</term>
<term>Corresponding increase</term>
<term>Coworker</term>
<term>Coworkers</term>
<term>Current study</term>
<term>Customer satisfaction</term>
<term>Darden school</term>
<term>Department size</term>
<term>Department values</term>
<term>Department values enactment</term>
<term>Departmental</term>
<term>Departmental context</term>
<term>Departmental coworkers</term>
<term>Departmental levels</term>
<term>Departmental members</term>
<term>Departmental values</term>
<term>Departmental values enactment</term>
<term>Effective behaviors role model behaviors</term>
<term>Employee</term>
<term>Employee behaviors</term>
<term>Employee commitment</term>
<term>Employee promotion</term>
<term>Employee promotions</term>
<term>Employee tenure</term>
<term>Employee turnover</term>
<term>Employee values</term>
<term>Employee values enactment</term>
<term>Employees work</term>
<term>Enactment</term>
<term>Enactment note</term>
<term>Enders tofighi</term>
<term>Ethical leadership</term>
<term>Explicit core</term>
<term>Future research</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Greater contribution</term>
<term>Greater degree</term>
<term>Greater rewards</term>
<term>Greater tenure</term>
<term>Group level</term>
<term>Gruys</term>
<term>Harvard business review</term>
<term>Health care organizations</term>
<term>Helpful feedback</term>
<term>Hierarchical</term>
<term>High degree</term>
<term>High level</term>
<term>High levels</term>
<term>Higher level</term>
<term>Higher levels</term>
<term>Higher scores</term>
<term>Hofmann gavin</term>
<term>Hospital physicians</term>
<term>Hypothesis testing</term>
<term>Independent variables</term>
<term>Individual employee turnover</term>
<term>Individual employee values</term>
<term>Individual employee values enactment</term>
<term>Individual employees</term>
<term>Individual level</term>
<term>Individual members</term>
<term>Individual values</term>
<term>Individual values department values enactment</term>
<term>Individual values enactment</term>
<term>Individual values enactment gender</term>
<term>Individual values enactment increases</term>
<term>Ineffective behaviors</term>
<term>Initial performance rating</term>
<term>Interactive effect</term>
<term>Interpersonal facilitation</term>
<term>Involuntary turnover</term>
<term>Larger departments</term>
<term>Lawrence erlbaum</term>
<term>Level factor</term>
<term>Likely source</term>
<term>Longitudinal data</term>
<term>Lower levels</term>
<term>Main effect terms</term>
<term>Main effects</term>
<term>Management journal</term>
<term>Management review</term>
<term>Management team</term>
<term>Manager values enactment</term>
<term>Managerial behavior</term>
<term>Modeling</term>
<term>More tenure</term>
<term>Motowidlo</term>
<term>Multilevel</term>
<term>Multilevel modeling</term>
<term>Nonsignificant</term>
<term>Nonsignificant relationship</term>
<term>Nonsignificant relationships</term>
<term>Nontask performance</term>
<term>Nursing education</term>
<term>Organ ryan</term>
<term>Organization science</term>
<term>Organizational</term>
<term>Organizational behavior</term>
<term>Organizational citizenship behavior</term>
<term>Organizational citizenship behaviors</term>
<term>Organizational climate</term>
<term>Organizational commitment</term>
<term>Organizational contexts</term>
<term>Organizational culture</term>
<term>Organizational effectiveness</term>
<term>Organizational goals</term>
<term>Organizational identification</term>
<term>Organizational integrity</term>
<term>Organizational level</term>
<term>Organizational performance</term>
<term>Organizational psychology</term>
<term>Organizational strategy</term>
<term>Organizational values</term>
<term>Other employees</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Paine</term>
<term>Patient safety</term>
<term>Performance appraisal periods</term>
<term>Performance appraisal process</term>
<term>Performance evaluation system</term>
<term>Performance management system</term>
<term>Personal performance</term>
<term>Personal values</term>
<term>Personnel psychology</term>
<term>Personnel selection</term>
<term>Practical implications</term>
<term>Predictor</term>
<term>Prentice hall</term>
<term>Previous research</term>
<term>Project group</term>
<term>Promotion decisions</term>
<term>Prosocial behavior</term>
<term>Rating form</term>
<term>Rating scale</term>
<term>Relationship slope</term>
<term>Research interests</term>
<term>Reward employees</term>
<term>Reward systems</term>
<term>Role model</term>
<term>Role modeling</term>
<term>Role models</term>
<term>Rosenthal masarech</term>
<term>Schneider</term>
<term>Scotter</term>
<term>Scotter motowidlo</term>
<term>Significant predictors</term>
<term>Smaller departments</term>
<term>Social context</term>
<term>Social influence</term>
<term>Social psychology</term>
<term>Special issue</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Standardized estimates</term>
<term>Standardized results</term>
<term>Strong congruence</term>
<term>Stronger alignment</term>
<term>Study variables</term>
<term>Such individuals</term>
<term>Such modeling</term>
<term>Task performance</term>
<term>Team effectiveness</term>
<term>Team members</term>
<term>Turnover</term>
<term>Value congruence</term>
<term>Values department values enactment</term>
<term>Values enactment</term>
<term>Values enactment rating</term>
<term>Values enactment rating scale</term>
<term>Values statements</term>
<term>Variance</term>
<term>Voluntary employee turnover</term>
<term>Voluntary turnover</term>
<term>Work behavior</term>
<term>Work group</term>
<term>Work groups</term>
<term>Wright state university</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Absolute level</term>
<term>Administrative science</term>
<term>Antecedent</term>
<term>Aspen institute</term>
<term>Associate professor</term>
<term>Bandura</term>
<term>Bliese</term>
<term>Borman motowidlo</term>
<term>Business ethics</term>
<term>Certain ways</term>
<term>Chatman</term>
<term>Cohen cohen</term>
<term>Collins porras</term>
<term>Common goal</term>
<term>Contextual</term>
<term>Contextual performance</term>
<term>Control variables</term>
<term>Core values</term>
<term>Corporate values</term>
<term>Corresponding decrease</term>
<term>Corresponding increase</term>
<term>Coworker</term>
<term>Coworkers</term>
<term>Current study</term>
<term>Customer satisfaction</term>
<term>Darden school</term>
<term>Department size</term>
<term>Department values</term>
<term>Department values enactment</term>
<term>Departmental</term>
<term>Departmental context</term>
<term>Departmental coworkers</term>
<term>Departmental levels</term>
<term>Departmental members</term>
<term>Departmental values</term>
<term>Departmental values enactment</term>
<term>Effective behaviors role model behaviors</term>
<term>Employee</term>
<term>Employee behaviors</term>
<term>Employee commitment</term>
<term>Employee promotion</term>
<term>Employee promotions</term>
<term>Employee tenure</term>
<term>Employee turnover</term>
<term>Employee values</term>
<term>Employee values enactment</term>
<term>Employees work</term>
<term>Enactment</term>
<term>Enactment note</term>
<term>Enders tofighi</term>
<term>Ethical leadership</term>
<term>Explicit core</term>
<term>Future research</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Greater contribution</term>
<term>Greater degree</term>
<term>Greater rewards</term>
<term>Greater tenure</term>
<term>Group level</term>
<term>Gruys</term>
<term>Harvard business review</term>
<term>Health care organizations</term>
<term>Helpful feedback</term>
<term>Hierarchical</term>
<term>High degree</term>
<term>High level</term>
<term>High levels</term>
<term>Higher level</term>
<term>Higher levels</term>
<term>Higher scores</term>
<term>Hofmann gavin</term>
<term>Hospital physicians</term>
<term>Hypothesis testing</term>
<term>Independent variables</term>
<term>Individual employee turnover</term>
<term>Individual employee values</term>
<term>Individual employee values enactment</term>
<term>Individual employees</term>
<term>Individual level</term>
<term>Individual members</term>
<term>Individual values</term>
<term>Individual values department values enactment</term>
<term>Individual values enactment</term>
<term>Individual values enactment gender</term>
<term>Individual values enactment increases</term>
<term>Ineffective behaviors</term>
<term>Initial performance rating</term>
<term>Interactive effect</term>
<term>Interpersonal facilitation</term>
<term>Involuntary turnover</term>
<term>Larger departments</term>
<term>Lawrence erlbaum</term>
<term>Level factor</term>
<term>Likely source</term>
<term>Longitudinal data</term>
<term>Lower levels</term>
<term>Main effect terms</term>
<term>Main effects</term>
<term>Management journal</term>
<term>Management review</term>
<term>Management team</term>
<term>Manager values enactment</term>
<term>Managerial behavior</term>
<term>Modeling</term>
<term>More tenure</term>
<term>Motowidlo</term>
<term>Multilevel</term>
<term>Multilevel modeling</term>
<term>Nonsignificant</term>
<term>Nonsignificant relationship</term>
<term>Nonsignificant relationships</term>
<term>Nontask performance</term>
<term>Nursing education</term>
<term>Organ ryan</term>
<term>Organization science</term>
<term>Organizational</term>
<term>Organizational behavior</term>
<term>Organizational citizenship behavior</term>
<term>Organizational citizenship behaviors</term>
<term>Organizational climate</term>
<term>Organizational commitment</term>
<term>Organizational contexts</term>
<term>Organizational culture</term>
<term>Organizational effectiveness</term>
<term>Organizational goals</term>
<term>Organizational identification</term>
<term>Organizational integrity</term>
<term>Organizational level</term>
<term>Organizational performance</term>
<term>Organizational psychology</term>
<term>Organizational strategy</term>
<term>Organizational values</term>
<term>Other employees</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Paine</term>
<term>Patient safety</term>
<term>Performance appraisal periods</term>
<term>Performance appraisal process</term>
<term>Performance evaluation system</term>
<term>Performance management system</term>
<term>Personal performance</term>
<term>Personal values</term>
<term>Personnel psychology</term>
<term>Personnel selection</term>
<term>Practical implications</term>
<term>Predictor</term>
<term>Prentice hall</term>
<term>Previous research</term>
<term>Project group</term>
<term>Promotion decisions</term>
<term>Prosocial behavior</term>
<term>Rating form</term>
<term>Rating scale</term>
<term>Relationship slope</term>
<term>Research interests</term>
<term>Reward employees</term>
<term>Reward systems</term>
<term>Role model</term>
<term>Role modeling</term>
<term>Role models</term>
<term>Rosenthal masarech</term>
<term>Schneider</term>
<term>Scotter</term>
<term>Scotter motowidlo</term>
<term>Significant predictors</term>
<term>Smaller departments</term>
<term>Social context</term>
<term>Social influence</term>
<term>Social psychology</term>
<term>Special issue</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Standardized estimates</term>
<term>Standardized results</term>
<term>Strong congruence</term>
<term>Stronger alignment</term>
<term>Study variables</term>
<term>Such individuals</term>
<term>Such modeling</term>
<term>Task performance</term>
<term>Team effectiveness</term>
<term>Team members</term>
<term>Turnover</term>
<term>Value congruence</term>
<term>Values department values enactment</term>
<term>Values enactment</term>
<term>Values enactment rating</term>
<term>Values enactment rating scale</term>
<term>Values statements</term>
<term>Variance</term>
<term>Voluntary employee turnover</term>
<term>Voluntary turnover</term>
<term>Work behavior</term>
<term>Work group</term>
<term>Work groups</term>
<term>Wright state university</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Science administrative</term>
<term>Chiffre d'affaires</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Business writers and practitioners recommend that core organizational values be integrated into employee work life for enhanced organizational productivity, yet no published studies have empirically examined the antecedents and outcomes of values enactment. Using longitudinal data on 2,622 employees, hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) results revealed that tenure and department-level values enactment were significant predictors of individual values enactment. Furthermore, employees who demonstrated high levels of values enactment were less likely to leave, and employees of high or low levels of values enactment in departments whose levels of values enactment matched their own were the most likely to be promoted.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Illinois</li>
<li>Ohio</li>
<li>Virginie</li>
<li>Washington (État)</li>
<li>État du Mississippi</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Gruys, Melissa L" sort="Gruys, Melissa L" uniqKey="Gruys M" first="Melissa L." last="Gruys">Melissa L. Gruys</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Bing, Mark N" sort="Bing, Mark N" uniqKey="Bing M" first="Mark N." last="Bing">Mark N. Bing</name>
<name sortKey="Goodstein, Jerry" sort="Goodstein, Jerry" uniqKey="Goodstein J" first="Jerry" last="Goodstein">Jerry Goodstein</name>
<name sortKey="Gruys, Melissa L" sort="Gruys, Melissa L" uniqKey="Gruys M" first="Melissa L." last="Gruys">Melissa L. Gruys</name>
<name sortKey="Stewart, Susan M" sort="Stewart, Susan M" uniqKey="Stewart S" first="Susan M." last="Stewart">Susan M. Stewart</name>
<name sortKey="Wicks, Andrew C" sort="Wicks, Andrew C" uniqKey="Wicks A" first="Andrew C." last="Wicks">Andrew C. Wicks</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006164 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 006164 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:E75EBE587781D480F016CA3CEFB752D57216C14E
   |texte=   Values Enactment in Organizations: A Multi-Level Examination
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022